| Hackworth
presents the Primer to Lord Finkle-McGraw
"Is
the binding and so on what you had in mind?" Hackworth said.
"Oh,
yes," said Lord Finkle-McGraw. "If I found it in an antiquarian
bookshop, covered with dust, I shouldn't give it a second glance."
"Because if you were not happy with any detail," Hackworth said,
"I could recompile it" He had come in hoping desperately that Finkle-McGraw
would object to some thing; this might give him an opportunity to
filch another copy for Fiona. But so far the Equity Lord had been
uncharacteristically complacent.
He kept flipping through the book, waiting for something to happen.
"It is unlikely to do anything interesting just now," Hackworth
said. "It won't really activate itself until it bonds" "Bonds?"
"As we discussed, it sees and hears everything in its vicinity,"
Hackworth said. "At the moment, it's looking for a small female.
As soon as a little girl picks it up and opens the front cover for
the first time, it will imprint that child's face and voice into
its memory-"
"Bonding with her. Yes, I see."
"And thenceforth it will see all events and persons in relation
to that girl, using her as a datum from which to chart a psychological
terrain, as it were. Maintenance of that terrain is one of the book's
primary processes. Whenever the child uses the book, then, it will
perform a sort of dynamic mapping from the database onto her particular
terrain." "You mean the database of folklore."
Hackworth hesitated. "Pardon me, but not precisely, sir. Folklore
consists of certain universal ideas that have been mapped onto local
cultures. For example, many cultures have a Trickster figure, so
the Trickster may be deemed a universal; but he appears in different
guises, each appropriate
to a particular culture's environment. The Indians of the American
Southwest called him Coyote, those of the Pacific Coast called him
Raven. Europeans called him Reynard the Fox. African-Americans called
him Br'er Rabbit. In twentieth-century literature he appears first
as Bugs Bunny and then as the Hacker."
Finkle-McGraw chuckled. "When I was a lad, that word had a double
meaning. It could mean a trickster who broke into things-but it
could also mean an especially skilled coder."
"The ambiguity is common in post-Neolithic cultures',' Hackworth
said. "As technology became more important the Trickster underwent
a shift in character and became the god of crafts - of technology,
if you will while retaining the underlying roguish qualities. So
we have the Sumerian Enki, the Greek Prometheus and Hermes, Norse
Loki, and so on.
"In any case," Hackworth continued, "Trickster/Technologist is just
one of the universals. The database is full of them. It's a catalogue
of the collective unconscious. In the old days, writers of children's
books had to map these universals onto concrete symbols familiar
to their audience - like Beatrix Potter mapping the Trickster onto
Peter Rabbit. This is a reasonably effective way to do it, especially
if the society is homogenous and static, so that all children share
similar experiences.
"What my team and I have done here is to abstract that process and
develop systems for mapping the universals onto the unique psychological
terrain of one child - even as that terrain changes over time. Hence
it is important that you not allow this book to fall into the hands
of any other little girl until Elizabeth has the opportunity to
open it up." "Understood," said Lord Alexander Chung-Sik Finkle-McGraw.
"I'll wrap it up myself, right now. Compiled some nice wrapping
paper this morning." He opened a desk drawer and took out a roll
of thick, glossy mediatronic paper bearing animated Christmas scenes:
Santa sliding down the chimney, the ballistic reindeer, the three
Zoroastrian sovereigns dismounting from their dromedaries in front
of the stable. There was a lull while Hackworth and McGraw watched
the little scenes; one of the hazards of living in a world filled
with mediatrons was that conversations were always being interrupted
in this way, and that explained why Atlantans tried to keep mediatronic
commodities to a minimum. Go into a thete's house, and every object
had moving pictures on it, everyone sat around slackjawed, eyes
jumping from the bawdy figures cavorting on the mediatronic toilet
paper to the big-eyed elves playing tag in the bathroom mirror to....
"Oh, yes," Finkle-McGraw said. "Can it be written on? I should like
to inscribe it to Elizabeth."
"The paper is a subclass of both input-paper and output-paper, so
it possesses all the underlying functionality of the sort of paper
you would write on. For the most part these functions are not used
- beyond, of course, simply making marks where the nib of the pen
has moved across it."
"You can write on it," Finkle-McGraw translated with some asperity,
"but it doesn't think about what you're writing." "Weil, my answer
to that question must be ambiguous," Hackworth said. "The Illustrated
Primer is an extremely general and powerful system capable of more
extensive self-reconfiguration than most. Remember that a fundamental
part of its job is to respond to its environment. If the owner were
to take up a pen and write on a blank page, this input would be
thrown into the hopper along with everying else, so to speak."
"Can I insribe it to Elizabeth or not?" Finkle-McGraw demanded.
"Certainly, sir."
Finkle-McGraw extracted a heavy gold fountain pen from a holder
on his desk and wrote in the front of the book for a while.
"That being done, sir, there remains only for you to authorise a
standing purchase order for the ractors."
"Ah, yes, thank you for reminding me," said Finkle-McGraw, not very
sincerely. "I still would have thought that for all the money that
went into this project -"
"That we might have solved the voice-generation problem to boot,
yes sir," Hackworth said. "As you know, we took some stabs at it,
but none of the results were up to the level of quality you demand.
After all of our technology, the pseudo-inteligence algorithms,
the vast exception matrices, the portent and content monitors, and
everything else, we still can't come close to generating a human
voice that sounds as good as what a real, live ractor can give us."
"Can't say I'm surprised, really," said Finkle-McGraw. "I just wish
it were a completely self-contained system."
"It might as well be, sir. At any given time there are tens of millions
of professional ractors in their stages all over the world, in every
time zone, ready to take on this kind of work at an instant's notice.
We are planning to authorise payment at a relatively high rate,
which should bring in only the best talent. You won't be disappointed
with the results."
|