Codependence

REPORT HOME | REPORT SITE MAP | RESEARCH DATABASE HOME | RESEARCH DATABASE MAP

A BRIEF LOOK AT THE PSYCHOLOGICAL LITERATURE:
PSYCHOLOGICAL ABSTRACTS

To prepare for writing this book the authors searched the data base of the psychological abstracts on a compact disk. These abstracts include articles from all sorts of psychological journals representing the cutting edge of psychological research and new developments. Since codependence is a new phenomenon, having surfaced by name only in the past few years, we checked all the abstracts and pertinent articles from January 1983 to September 1988 (inclusive). This led to the discovery that traditional psychological literature contains only a few references to the disease of codependence, at least by name.

The following eight articles pertaining to "codependence" or "codependency" were all published since 1985.

Lans Lesater et al. (1985), examined family and social problems of clients at a community clinic, including chemical use patterns. The survey comparing random patients and those receiving mental health care indicates that thirty-nine percent of those receiving mental health care had one member of the family using drugs at the "circumstantial-situational" level as compared to thirty percent of the total clinical group. The author concludes that chemical use and associated problems such as codependence are significant factors affecting families.

Sydney Walter (1986) presents a case in which the wife of a male alcoholic learned to detach herself from herhusband's drinking.

Jean Caldwell (1986) presents guidelines for working with codependent families and getting them ready for intervention. The author emphasizes that challenging dysfunctional behavior in analcoholic is only successful when combined with supporting his healthy behavior.

Neil M. Rothberg (1986) presents a family systems approach to alcoholism by examining the dynamics working within marital subsystems, three family-oriented models, and possible treatment and goals. Both spouses are shown to be contributors to the alcoholic problem and both are affected by it.

Gierymski and Williams (1986) state that wives (and probably other members) in families with an alcoholic member are more likely to suffer emotional problems than the families of nonalcoholics, although the exact degree and form of their emotional problems vary and no clear-cut entity corresponding precisely to the concept of codependence has emerged. In short the authors express skepticism concerning the validity of the concept of codependence.

Timmon Cermak in the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (1986) argues that codependence can be defined within the DSM-m criteria for mixed personality disorder. He proposes five diagnostic criteria in the style of DSM-m. According to Cermak the essential features of codependency include (1) consensual investment of self-esteem in the ability to influence/control feelings and behavior in self and others in the face of obvious adverse consequences; (2) assumption of responsibility for meeting other's needs to the exclusion of acknowledging one's own needs; (3) anxiety and boundary distortions in situations of intimacy and separation; (4) enmeshment in relationships with personality disordered, drug dependent and impulse disordered individuals; and (5) exhibits (in any combinations of three or more) constriction or emotions with or without dramatic outbursts, depression, hypervigilance, compulsions, anxiety, excessive reliance on denial, substance abuse, recurrent physical or sexual abuse, stress-related medical illness, and/or a primary relationship with an active substance abuser for at least two years without seeking outside support.

Cermak takes each criterion and points out how it relates to established DSM diseases (e.g., Dependent Personality Disorder, Borderline Personality Disorder, Histrionic Personality Disorder).

Cermak alone in the psychological literature searched has tried to describe codependence and present a case for its deserving serious consideration as a disease.

Sondra Smalley (1987) discussed dependency issues in lesbian relationships. Although not particularly helpful in describing what codependence is, the author proposes a model that focuses on the client's intervention in her own codependent relationship patterns.

Frederich A. Prezioso (1987) discusses spirituality as it relates to the treatment of chemically dependent and codependent people in a 21-28 day inpatient treatment setting. The author suggests addressing spiritual issues using staff training sessions and weekly staff groups, patient lectures and discussion groups, family presentations, and individualized treatment plans.

In trying to determine what research had been done (under other headings) on the cluster of symptoms we are calling codependence, we checked the Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms (1985). This thesaurus (which contains all the subject headings under which articles are listed in the psychological abstracts) does not contain any references to either "codependence" or "codependency." A check of all the articles recorded in the abstracts under the heading "dependency (personality)" and "child abuse" (the headings relating most nearly to what we are describing here) for the January 1983 to September 1988 period revealed that very little has been considered worthy of inclusion in those abstracts that pertains to the identifiable diagnosis of the disorder and symptoms we are calling codependence and its connection with child abuse.

In all the psychological literature appearing in the Psych-Lit data base during the period from January 1983 to September 1988 there seems to be only one person's work (used as a reference by several writers) that sees in the category "dependency (personality)" something close to what we are talking about when we speak of codependence. As a matter of fact all the references we found that related "dependency" to the symptoms that make up what we are calling codependence cited the same book, Neurosis in Human Growth, by psychiatrist Karen Horney (1950). Some of her insights and descriptions of symptoms are similar to those in this volume but evidently they were never developed or expanded in subsequent literature in the direction we are pointing.

Horney saw healthy adults as autonomous to a great extent but believed that ultimately all people find survival difficult without the physical and emotional presence, support, and caring of others. Such interdependence enables us to grow and thrive and is necessary to the realization of individuality.

Neurosis, however, leads to seeking both fulfilLnent and a sense of one's self from other people. Relating to others becomes increasingly compulsive and may take the form of blind dependency, rebellion, the need to excel, or avoidance of involvement at all costs. In all these ways, neurotics demonstrate the importance others have for them.

Such dependence is usually characterized by infiexibility in relating, abdication of responsibility for one's own life, intolerance, depression, rage, and vindictiveness when one's demands on others are not met, indiscriminate sacrifice of one's own best interests, and a magical belief that one will find an answer to life through others. Dependence can be seen as a way of experiencing and relating to others that is a part of the particular character structure Horney calls the self-effacing solution" (in chapter 9 of the book cited).

Security, meaningfulness of life, and a sense of self are believed by the neurotic to be attainable only through the strength and caring of others. Therefore moving toward others may reach the point of wishing to lose oneself and merge totally with another person. Consequently, being lovable, helpless, self-effacing, and small is cultivated and glorified in such people. Strength and autonomy, while sought in a protector, are shunned and repressed in oneself. Evaluation of oneself depends on lovableness; love, especially erotic love, offers the promise of supreme fulfillment. The subdued helpless part of oneself is experienced as its very essence, and one's lovableness, loving sacrifice, and especially suffering are taken as justification for demanding total devotion in return.

 

Mellody, Miller and Miller. Facing Codependence. HarperCollins. 1989.